Fusion ankündigung - Page 4 - Discussions Game

Urotsukidoji · May 17th 2021

Quote from Halberd

Dear Urotsukidoji,
You admit it is good that the top players are limited in their troop production. Can you also indicate what you think is a fair way to achieve this? Please also give solutions .

There is another post where I have given 3 options, please rescue it and your question will have been resolved.

All that option that implies a percentage of loss of production equal for all the top I'm sure that it will be welcome for all.

By the way, thank you, I'm flattered by a good response from the damoria team.

Chemilla · May 17th 2021

Good evening

a question is paused all the same if we have reached the limit of normal castles or baldurs is that we take from an enemy a castle or a baldurs that means that we will not be able to recruit on it so the enemies to take over the castle or the baldurs easily

it doesn't make sense

it would perhaps be a system which allows that at each conquest we have the right to recruit over time that the castle is to dispute that would be more logical

cordially

Halberd · May 17th 2021

Chemilla, Thank you for the clear example. But why is it not possible to stop recruiting one of your own castles in order to recruit into the castle you can conquer?

Quote from Urotsukidoji

There is another post where I have given 3 options, please rescue it and your question will have been resolved.
All that option that implies a percentage of loss of production equal for all the top I'm sure that it will be welcome for all.

By the way, thank you, I'm flattered by a good response from the damoria team.

I have completely read through the forum and saw no unanswered questions or ideas anymore. Searching the forum again for 1 particular post is at the expense of the time I can spend on this forum. If you think your ideas have been insufficiently covered, you will have to put forward these ideas and arguments again. If this is done in a respectful manner, you will also receive a respectful answer.

08/15 · May 17th 2021

An overtake isn't done by accident or on a whim.
Attacks are planed and executed. So, why can't
you also plan to recruite in that or these castles
by leaving a productionslot untouched so you can
add the conquered castle to the queue?

Krypt0n1te · May 17th 2021

Quote from Chemilla

Wenn wir 2 Edelsteinfüllungen haben, die wir auf eu1 übertragen wollten, und danach konnten wir es nicht tun, dass wir keine 2 Schatzkammern bei 100 haben, dass wir nur 10 Tage Zeit haben, um sie zu bauen, ist, dass es unmöglich ist, welche Methode hast du mir gegeben ???

erstens: ich muss Dir gar keine Möglichkeit für Irgendwas geben

zweitens: das Spiel hat gewisse Risiken, manchmal macht man Dinge und es hat am Ende kein Sinn, das ist auch eine Tatsache

drittens: welches Gewicht hat jetzt diese Dramaturgie, dass Du keine 2 Schatzkammern hast. was macht das für Dich so unerträglich?

nochmal, es ist ein Spiel! Ansprüche aus etwas Virtuellem mit dem Realen zu vermengen, ist nicht wirklich sinnvoll. Wenn Du die Füllung gekauft hast, dann ist es leider Pech. Aber Du würdest nicht sterben. Wenn Du es durch einen Boni gewonnen hast, entsteht Dir kein Nachteil, weil Du nicht schlechter gestellt bist als vorher.

also reiss Dich einfach ein bisschen zusammen und bleib in einem gesunden Verhältnis zur Tatsache, dass wir ein Spiel spielen. Die fehlende Schatzkammer treibt Dich nicht in eine Insolvenz

Dschibait · May 17th 2021

Quote from Urotsukidoji

And we continue with the disqualifications, great administrator!
And no, I'm not saying for 10 posts that this change is not good for me, I'm saying that this change is not fair for everyone and doesn't imply the same losses for everyone, it is an unfair change and should be illegal.

I explain it again because it seems that there are some people who are hard of hearing, or rather who don't want or are interested in understanding what I say:

Before the changes:

1 Top player produces a similar amount to another top player, that is... Player 1 = Player 2

Player 1 for example produced troops in 120 normal castles and 100 baldurs, in total he produced troops in 220 castles.

Player 2 for example produced troops in 50 normal castles and 170 baldurs, in total he produced troops in 220 castles.

So far fine, no one got lost? We continue...

After the changes:

Player 1 produces troops in 100 normal castles and 30 baldurs, in total he produces in 130 castles.

Player 2 produces troops in 50 normal castles and 30 baldurs, in total he produces in 80 castles.

For those who don't understand much about mathematics 130> 80.

Overnight, Player 1 produces troops in 50 more castles than Player 2.

Equality for all right? fair for everyone right? totally legal this change? really?

Now players will start to come out complaining about the inequality of the fusion of worlds, that the top players are top because they have been very lucky and not because they are good players, that the top players deserve this reduction, surely I will receive some disqualification or threat, I'm starting to get used to it... but the question is not that, the question is... because overnight 2 players who produce the same, stop producing the same due to a change in the rules? Why does one benefit and the other lose? because the game adapts like a glove for one, and for the other it implies months or years of adaptation and loss of equality with the other?

Do you want to reduce the troop production of the top players? perfect to do it, I even agree, but that the reduction is the same percentage for everyone. That some lose 10% of their production and others lose 60% of their production when both produced the same thing is far from being the same, fair and legal.

Display More

i stop this here ....

you explain just your position in game. you have 200+ gold castles and yes, this solution dont fit to your strategy - and thats why you "cry and cry" again.

i already explained why we choose these numbers, i also answered to your 3 options.
You - again and again call me "disqualified", because i tell you the truth

in general - i like discussions, i like new ideas and i like if someone explains there strategy and why we "kill" them - but you dont do that - you just kicked asses of admins and if someone explained it you say "you are disqualified"

thats enough - you will get your forum and ingame ban, so you dont need to think about this update at all. Thank you for your aggressive und unnassasary words.

-futrtie80- · May 17th 2021

Quote from Dschibait

i stop this here ....
you explain just your position in game. you have 200+ gold castles and yes, this solution dont fit to your strategy - and thats why you "cry and cry" again.

i already explained why we choose these numbers, i also answered to your 3 options.
You - again and again call me "disqualified", because i tell you the truth

in general - i like discussions, i like new ideas and i like if someone explains there strategy and why we "kill" them - but you dont do that - you just kicked asses of admins and if someone explained it you say "you are disqualified"

thats enough - you will get your forum and ingame ban, so you dont need to think about this update at all. Thank you for your aggressive und unnassasary words.

Display More

It seems that now we have enough good players, this is how you value the time spent and money spent.
I remember recently the option of lowering the banning of players who cheat, due to the shortage of players and now unnecessarily bannees a great player, for expressing his discomfort by the implementation of an update... I write my discomfort about this situation and my current discontent that will affect the way I play and invest in the game. To begin with I will stop contributing and posting to the forum in protest to this measure.

Dschibait · May 18th 2021

Quote from -futrtie80-

It seems that now we have enough good players, this is how you value the time spent and money spent.I remember recently the option of lowering the banning of players who cheat, due to the shortage of players and now unnecessarily bannees a great player, for expressing his discomfort by the implementation of an update... I write my discomfort about this situation and my current discontent that will affect the way I play and invest in the game. To begin with I will stop contributing and posting to the forum in protest to this measure.

thats ok for me - i like to say that he is bannned because of the fact that he can't discuss with us. I dont let me insulting again and again.

There are many other players here who like to discuss, like to bring solutions and like to get also bad feedback in a respectful way. But again and again he gets explained stuff from me, and nothing returned, he just dont want to read me and want to kick admins.

Szabika · May 18th 2021

Hi Dschibait!

If you don't like someone's opinion, post, idea here on the forum then should it be banned from the game? If you limit the players in the forum I might understand.
But you kick out him because you are angry. Hummm
Please show a player on this forum who agrees with your decision.
You have blocked the leader of the Spanish alliance!!!!!!

Regards

Dschibait · May 18th 2021

Quote from Szabika

Hi Dschibait!

If you don't like someone's opinion, post, idea here on the forum then should it be banned from the game? If you limit the players in the forum I might understand.
But you kick out him because you are angry. Hummm
Please show a player on this forum who agrees with your decision.
You have blocked the leader of the Spanish alliance!!!!!!

Regards

Display More

Did you read his post - I wrote with him and discuss with him last 36 hours - but again and again insults against the team and also me - this is why he is banned in game - not because of we have different opinions

Chemilla · May 18th 2021

Quote from Halberd

Chemilla, Thank you for the clear example. But why is it not possible to stop recruiting one of your own castles in order to recruit into the castle you can conquer?

the castle must be finished recruiting to be able to recruit in another castle if I'm not mistaken

Covadonga · May 18th 2021

Ich verstehe, dass ein Verstoß gegen eine Spielregel zu einem Spielverbot führt, aber dies ist das Forum des Spiels. Wenn jemand gegen eine Forenregel verstößt, sollte er nur aus dem Forum verbannt werden, nicht aus dem Spiel

Dschibait · May 18th 2021

Hört auf bitte darüber zu diskutieren - wenn jemand ein Team Mitglied beleidigt wird der überall dicht gemacht

KingPatrick · May 18th 2021

Hallo
Dschibait,

ich würde Vorschlagen ihr macht mal alle eine Pause im Forum bist nach Pfingsten.
Dann hast du mal Zeit in deiner schmerzhaften Zeit dich um das wichtige zu kümmern und die anderen können ihre Gemüter runter kühlen!

Es ist immer noch ein Spiel und ja eingeschränkt zu werden tut weh aber manchmal ist es eben notwendig.

Den Spieler den du im Spiel gesperrt hast finde ich jetzt übertrieben, auch wenn man beleidigt wird, dann sollte er nur aus dem Forum raus, aber im Spiel ist nicht in Ordnung, wer auch immer es ist.

Wir alle sind Menschen mit Emotionen und in der jetzigen Zeit fällt dem einen oder anderen die Decke auf dem Kopf und dann reagiert man auch mal falsch.

Also seit doch alle verständlich miteinander, eure Köpfe könnt ihr euch im Spiel mit euren Gefolge einhauen aber verbal hier im Forum sollte es vernünftig hergehen.

Gruß
Patrick

Dschibait · May 18th 2021

Ich werde das Thema jetzt hier schließen. Ich hab euch gebeten nicht weiter über den Fall zu diskutieren. Der Spieler kann durchaus seinen Account wieder entbannen, wenn er denn so einsichtig ist wie du @KingPatrick - aber ich lasse weder dem Team, die das hier alles kostenlos, freiwillig machen, noch mir andauernd auf der Nase rumtanzen.

/closed