Wer betrügt gehört bestraft. Wer will nachvollziehen seit wann die Betroffenen Spieler denn die Bugs einsetzen und wieviel geschenkte (betrogen) Truppen bisher ohne Reue in Kämpfen geopfert wurden da ja kein Aufwand und kein Geld dazu verwendet wurde.
90% Truppenverlust ist hart aber fair. Das tut nämlich richtig weh und wirft die Spieler um Monate zurück um wieder eine aktive Rolle zu spielen.
Ich bleibe dabei... wer betrügt gehört empfindlich gestraft.... weil er damit alle ehrlichen Spieler beschissen hat.
... Meine Meinung dazu!!!
-
-
Es ist, als würde man jemanden für 10 Jahre ins Gefängnis stecken, weil er ein Huhn gestohlen hat.
Ich habe mir sagen lassen, dass es Länder gibt, wo du beim Stehlen eines Huhns vom fremden Grundstück sogar erschossen werden kannst. Und der Besitzer des Huhns würde vor Gericht sogar das Recht bekommen, den Eindringling erschossen zu haben^^ Schlimm, nicht wahr? Aber dadurch wissen dort halt alle, die gerne Hühner stehlen, dass sie nicht nur 10 Jahren bekommen können, sondern lebenslänglich in Form einer Kugel...
Jemand, der massiv ins Spiel eingreift, muss dementsprechend bestraft werden und die Strafe muss auch empfindlich sein, damit sie auch abschreckend wirkt und nicht gar zum Betrügen einlädt. Aber das hatten wir hier schon mal gehabt mit Hochstädters Vorschlag zur Vorwarnung bei Scriptnutzung. Indiskutabel.
Es mag hart sein. Wie ich schon geschrieben hatte, verstehe ich auch diejenigen, die bestraft wurden. Aber diese Spieler sind alle erwachsen genug und haben die Scripte bewusst eingesetzt, um sich Vorteile zu verschaffen. Also sollten sie froh sein, dass sie überhaupt eine Möglichkeit bekommen, das Spiel fortzusetzen. In den meisten anderen Spielen wären die Accounts dicht geblieben.
Meine Meinung.
-
there are precedents,
when they were discovered some Russian, Polish players etc ... who used insects the punishment was troop reduction of 90% and 6 months of ban, nobody was scandalized by the harsh punishment, why should things be different now? perhaps these players who used scripts or bots to cheat are more sympathetic than the Russians and Poles at the time? in respect of all there should be no differences. -
El administrador ha borrado mi ultimo post y 2 aclaraciones seguidas, lastima os perdeis de leer mi ironia y doble sentido en contestacion a unos jugadores. Antes ya dije que no iba a postear mas con el administrador y ahora deberia cerrar este hilo. porque no creo que se aporte nada nuevo y las decisiones ya han sido tomadas por lo tanto postear es repetirse en balde.
Vuelvo a solicitar a 8/15 que si es tan amable me conteste a la pregunta que hice sobre el listado de fuerza militar.
Y tambien vuelvo a desearle al administrador por el bien del juego y de los jugadores que la proxima vez mejore aun mas su justicia.
Marfru
Google traslator
The administrator has deleted my last post and 2 clarifications in a row, it hurts you miss reading my irony and double meaning in reply to some players. Earlier I said that I was not going to post any more with the administrator and now I should close this thread. because I don't think anything new is being contributed and the decisions have already been made, so posting is in vain.
I once again ask 8/15 if you are so kind to answer the question I asked about the list of military forces.
And I also wish the administrator again for the good of the game and the players that next time he improves his justice even more. -
read that delete message ! I deleted your posts because you wrote 3 posts in a row. There are also not double posts allowed, what you think is with triple posting?
You can post it again in ONE post!
I didnt deleted that because of the content, i also don't read them at all.
-
You can post it again in ONE post!
No vale la pena . "alea iacta est" por lo que no es necesario reescribirlo de nuevo, ademas no me acuerdo de todo , y aunque habia mucha ironia y doble sentido con algo de sarcasmo, podria haber gente que se confundiera y podria sentirse ofendida, no todo el mundo es capaz de entender y encajar el humor critico.
Salud y fuerza.
google traslator
Not worth it . "alea iacta est" so it is not necessary to rewrite it again, also I do not remember everything, and although there was a lot of irony and double meaning with some sarcasm, there could be people who were confused and could feel offended, not everyone is able to understand and accommodate critical humor.
Health and strength. -
Display More
read that delete message ! I deleted your posts because you wrote 3 posts in a row. There are also not double posts allowed, what you think is with triple posting?
You can post it again in ONE post!
I didnt deleted that because of the content, i also don't read them at all.
""I didnt deleted that because of the content, i also don't read them at all.""
Below is the English translation. I'm afraid the translator doesn't do a good job and in my language, and for a native speaker, I don't think there will be any doubts about what I mean.
Esta frase preocupa-me muito. Pode ler-se como:
AA - Postagem triplicada e apaguei devido a isso e nem leio porque não deve existir postagem multipla;
BB - Apaguei porque é postagem múltipla mas de qualquer forma eu nem leio o que vem desta pessoa / fação.
...preocupa-me imenso, como cidadão, como pessoa de bem, que a frase seja lida na forma BB. Como cidadão, pessoa de bem quero acreditar que a forma correta é a AA e trata-se apenas dum erro de tradução ou de escrita à pressa.
Liberdade de expressão, com o devido respeito, sempre! Direito inalienável!This sentence worries me a lot. It can be read as:
AA - Post tripled and deleted due to this and I don't even read it because there shouldn't be a duplicate post;
BB - I deleted it because it's a multiple post but anyway I don't even read what comes from this person / faction.
....I am very concerned, as a citizen, as a good person, that the phrase is read in the BB form. As a citizen, a good person, I want to believe that the correct form is AA and it is just a translation error or a hasty writing error.
Freedom of expression, with all due respect, at all times! Inalienable right! -
Dschibait is responsible for what he writes, not for what you read from it.
If you see a double post or even a triple post, it is not necessary to read
the content to realize that it is in fact a double or triple post. In that case
you can delete the not allowed posting regardless if you read it before or
not.
As a matter of fact, nobody can read it after it is deleted, so why should
the mod be the "only one" who read it? -
ich kann es nicht glauben
Chemilla kritisiert, was vor einem Monat sie applaudiert hat
Ohrfeigen scheinen dein eigenes Gesicht mehr zu verletzen als das deines Nachbarn
Seguiloic und Arrow müssen sehr wütend sein
Richtige Chemilla??Hello
I would like to know what I criticize is that I applauded a month ago
cordially
