Hello support team. I don't find it right that gray castles are open to attack by everyone when they are conquered. When the players who have just started the game by chance capture a new big castle, the big players attack and take the castle from the small player. (especially the tyra players, Seguloic and Raswir). For captured gray castles, attack must be free only between players of the same level. I leave the matter to your discretion. 
best regards
damoria game world 1, my nick ATANASİO from NATO castle= Alcazar de i dont know user İD::))
i am playing a long time ,I've been playing ever since Bigpoint..How do I find out ? I never needed..
.SHADOW. a new player or multi accout ATANASİO ???
It looks simulaf. Now his name is also:
|
i need some more context ...
what is the problem with this playername?
Hello support team. I don't find it right that gray castles are open to attack by everyone when they are conquered. When the players who have just started the game by chance capture a new big castle, the big players attack and take the castle from the small player. (especially the tyra players, Seguloic and Raswir). For captured gray castles, attack must be free only between players of the same level. I leave the matter to your discretion.
best regards
this is about a grey castle that the player GRELL - N~V ,a small player took and that was attacked by Raswir TvT .
Raswir than put the link to a former message in the forum wher .SHADOW. claims he is the player ATANASIO:
RE: crusade bonus
and now raswir askes who .shadow.is: the small, rookie Grell of the big veteran player Atanasio that started playing in bigpoints time. Maybe one of those players can explain?
Then, to avoid disappointment, you should also know that: Attacking the same castle, reducing troops, lowering residents' approval, and knocking down the wall ( attacking the same castle) for a player you share IP with are also considered pushing.
To stay with the theme of attacks of gray castles; Normally, all players neatly keep in mind that the first player to get their hands on the gray castle is the owner. But since the alliance NATO has fallen apart without surrendering, all ex-NATO members have been entered as enemies into the TVT alliance. As a result, TVT players do not have to withdraw attacks on a gray castle if an ex NATO player captures it.
So I see no need to protect small players after conquering a gray castle . One of the drawback is, that small players can be used to secure gray castles; A major player takes down the wall and reduces the troops, a minor player captures the castle and, after all attacks on the gray castle have stopped( because of the requested protection), the castle is captured by the major alliance-member.
Within our alliance, small players are helped and sometimes get castles from alliance mates. When our little players capture a gray castle, the entire alliance cooperates to make sure they keep it; diplomats and, if necessary, the fighters. I thought protecting small players was important to you.
So as far as I'm concerned, there's no need for extra protection for smaller players capturing gray castles.
What I write now is not based on personal grudges or interests like you.
This is not apparent from the messages you post here 
Within our alliance, small players are helped and sometimes get castles from alliance mates. When our little players capture a gray castle, the entire alliance cooperates to make sure they keep it; diplomats and, if necessary, the fighters. I thought protecting small players was important to you.
So as far as I'm concerned, there's no need for extra protection for smaller players capturing gray castles
People may have different opinions. I don't think like you. As always, the decision will be made by the admin team on this matter. Maybe we both think wrong. Maybe this dialogue will help reorganize or find a middle ground. I gave my opinion. Topic closed for me.
I am ATANASIO who is writing now. but the first message was written by my 14-year-old daughter. its name in the game is GRELL.
When she saw that I had been playing a game for years and asked if we should play together, we opened an account for her, and in the settings section, we declared that we lived in the same house and shared the same internet connection.I never interfered with his account as I was punished without knowing it before. I didn't give her a castle. and I did not support her in any attack. Including your attacks. By the way, thanks to you, my daughter learned that she shouldn't trust everyone. But when we both write our requests on the forum, the same name comes up. It's that simple. I think my daughter has already written to Raswir. According to my daughter, Raswir also kindly gestured to her and retracted the attacks.I also thank him here.
Du schreibst hier das du nichts mit deinem Kind zusammen kämpft in diesem Spiel, den erklär mir den doch mal warum ihr beiden Schlößer von Twinny erobert, Da dies nicht der Erste Vorfall ist und ich schon öfters gesehen hab das die beiden Accounts zusammen agieren sollte endlich mal ein perma ban kommen.
Du schreibst hier das du nichts mit deinem Kind zusammen kämpft in diesem Spiel, den erklär mir den doch mal warum ihr beiden Schlößer von Twinny erobert, Da dies nicht der Erste Vorfall ist und ich schon öfters gesehen hab das die beiden Accounts zusammen agieren sollte endlich mal ein perma ban kommen.
du weisst genauso wie alle anderen das diese Art von Diskussionen nicht im Forum geführt werden.
Wenn du beweise hast, schreib diese dem Admin Team per Support Ticket und wir werden uns der Sache annehmen.
Die Regeln sind sehr eindeutig; es darf keine Aktionen zusammen über die selbe IP (auch wenn der Match erlaubt ist) getätigt werden.
Sollte dies der Fall sein, wird es hier eine Bestrafung geben, welche aber genau, dass überlasse auch bitte dem Team.
also in english - game has rules, if you and your daughter playing on the same iip, thats not a problem - but playing on the same ip and having same targets is against our ToC ... if you think that anything is fine and the evidences here are not true, you can ignore it - if you think that you and your daughters multi account is doing "too many stuff together" (like attacks and so on) you should write to the GO team directly - its better when finding a punichment if the player is knowing that something was "false"
du weisst genauso wie alle anderen das diese Art von Diskussionen nicht im Forum geführt werden.
Wenn du beweise hast, schreib diese dem Admin Team per Support Ticket und wir werden uns der Sache annehmen.
Ja dies weiss ich aber du weisst auch das Support Tickets eine ganze weile dauern bis sie bearbeitet werden und solche Spieler in der Zeit noch viel weiter mißt bauen können. Da hier die Beweise ja schon vorliegen durch die Aussage von Shadow und meine Screens. Das vielleicht mal schneller reagiert wird.
Außerdem hat mich mal die Ausrede intressiert um mich zu amisieren 
Lg Beule
ps: Ticket ist raus
Das Team spielt aber nicht - wir haben derzeit mich und einen Admin, der recht inaktiv ist und beispielsweise auf W2 garnicht spielt.
Es macht also kein Sinn zu sagen "Team macht, wenn überhaupt erst spät was", wenn man erst nach Tagen etwas reported
Ich habe diesen Fall jetzt angenommen (ich hatte auch vorherige Fälle von den 2 Spielern schon bearbeitet), nicht das hier irgendwelche "der Admin ist in der Ally blabla" gerüchte aufkommen.
Und dabei sind mir auch irgendwelche Ausreden egal. Hier wurde schon mehrmals von den beiden Spielern auf unseren Regeln, die für alle gelten, rumgetreten.... das hat hier und jetzt ein Ende.
Grüße
Dschibait
