So the bigger players gets more benefits 
why don't you try to make it fair for all players?
-
-
Is there any chance that there wil come a apportunity that we can relocate secondary castles in the future, onfortunitly I had to capitulate just a moment before you came with the big updates.
if not, that's ok by me, then I'll demolish my subs, but if there is a cance it's posible in the future, I'll wait
Never say never, but right now:
we didn't have any plans for such
event.Now you came with the new update for higher troop production to help bigger players that had to capitulate, (they are more important), I'm small, just playing since 2009. so I understand that! But it make no sence to relocate your Main castle (what I did) when you can't relocate the secondary castles, But I bet you have other thoughts. And you should'nt see this option like a event!!
Best Regards Reneetje -
we need logs about what this capitulation brings or not ... We talked about different features like building-time reduction, troop speed, resource speed ... with your and also other cases we saw that the troop amount is the biggest problem to come back.
Sry, i know that for players like you who are the first in capitulation this isn't a good publishing interval ... but i hope that you see the updates still as good for anyone who needs to go the same way like you.Yeah wright, but with your interfearing in the war, with the updates is Jendrzej the Alliance that get the most benefits, And they started the War with more alliances against one small one. And for the small Alliance you do nothing, So again we are not important!
-
we intorduce the capitulation update before your war here
https://board.bitmeup.com/inde…-and-Capitulation-Update/and we already wrote to get as goal, to keep this player still in our game / in our community. Did you really want to loose the loosing players in last war ?
Players who spent money to get features, and a future, pay for servers etc ... players who want to fight, who want to play all your loved game..
I also would do that if NATO would lose a war, or KN or someone else .. that these mechanics to keep players are in first line for these players who lost and may will stop playing isn't a secret ... im not sure which steps you / or other players would go here ... but now, we have attractive the option to stay in game and come back.Hahaha You're saying you want to keep that player in the game, with the bennefits, But what about us? when other players had to capitulate, (me included) a few months ago, you didn't updated anything to help us! I gues we are not that important???
-
vanmorris: it is really not fair that you cant participate in an global event just because you have capitulated, your ally members should have the opurtunity too to be part of that
That should be nice, but I've missed already 2 global events, and my capitulation wil be over soon, so changing the rules now, is'nt fair at all. we all knew the rules. and 6 months is not that long.
-
no vanmoris I say that when damoria makes a event that and normal that everyone can participate otherwise it and an injustice for some players and that and a benefit for others while damoria must be neutral with everyone
well I was one of the first players who capitulated, so 6 months ago I would agree with you! but now I think it has to stay as it is. to keep it fear and neutral!
-
Is there any chance that there wil come a apportunity that we can relocate secondary castles in the future, onfortunitly I had to capitulate just a moment before you came with the big updates.
if not, that's ok by me, then I'll demolish my subs, but if there is a cance it's posible in the future, I'll wait
-
Display More
whats your problem ? i react in 2 weeks ... you have an update where other companies need more than a quad of a year for that.... so pls dont blame me - we do our best that this is not happening again.
btw: you are mad that i react now - but if i would react a month before - you would like this update?
this is what i mean - many of you only see there actual situation not the whole on in damora
i close this - i didnt see any chance that this will come to an end
Sorry Dschibait, You asked me what's my problem, but you didn't give me the chance to answer in the toppic Multi acounts
And I do like a lot of your updates, And you and your team, are doing a pretty good job.
but you use the updates to change a war, that's not right.
And yes when you came a month earlyer that was better , then I and some others not had to be capitulated, and others from my Alliance didn't quit playing the.
game.Now I made my point, and I"ll stop this discusion.
Regards Reneetje
-
Display More
you are not true... with the capitulation update we bring a feature in that you can capitulate if you LOST many troops.. This dosn't help if you lost only castles or only troops.
This feature is the last step before leaving the game. Its a "ok i have 6months to build me back up" feature - but many allied members are not doing this because they may want to help there mates.So yes, you are right, we had the capitulation already in - but this other system is to protect the smaller players to get more even fights. We see that our increasement to 3billion points not working well, so we starting to doing this.
A war in damoria can go more and more months - we have veteran players and contacts to old players that we talk about this and they all say, that such a war may never ends.
So yes, maybe we could wait 6months or 12months or 24months or longer - but than there would be reactions from our community (and there are already come up - we are in some skype channels from some leading alliances) - that we dont do anything.so like i wrote - i think you already read that - you can't get all players with this update... so its ok if you think we could handle it an other way - but now it happens.
btw: i didn't say that the fight was not even - or not fair - i say that the first fight was even and fair, and the second one with 3 biggest alliances - which based on the fact that they think that the first one wasn't fair - isn't correct - but what happend in damoria stays in damoria
its ok if you want to have this fight this will not change my mind, what i see and know.regards
DschibaitWow, the first fight, 5 or 6 alliances against one smaller Alliance is fair, but when theyr friends come to help them what are the biggest alliances, then you have a problem ??? The agressors knew that the smaller Alliance were friends with the biggest alliances, so they could espect that the bigger alliances wil interfear in the war, So it was theyr own choiche to start the war, but when it's going wrong you're helping them becoase then it's unfaair, Your words if I understood it right
-
I gues that players belong to your aliance
-
Throughout the war, Alliance BR would have time to tow your Castels, and now you want them back without a fight
No Ostry, I would fight for it when it's possible
-
One question, if I get this right. I was forced to capitulate, I was under atack by 6 players and the smalest player is 5x as big as me, so they can't attack me annymore, and I can't get my castles back, So the capitulation makes no sence annymore?
-
Sorry Dschibait,
I respect you, and I didn't wanted to be rude, but I can't see annything positive in the new options, but that's my opinion. -
how to rebuild a senator's building in a castle already full?
I have to demolish and rebuild senatorial buildings?
To get a good result it will take me a year to see more
Would you rather use gold buy?
I'm sorry to talk to you hard, but I think you're just looking for solutions that make us spend money.What solutions? I didn't see anny,
-
But JG union wants to fight Nato. Didn't you read that? But Nato does not want to fight without LGH.
So what's the problem? if you want to fight them, now they are just attacking 3 members, and you're Alliance start crying already
-
Display More
A big thanks to all that are destroying the game.
Yes maybe the war against BR was not fair. But it is a war game.
What is happening now is that the biggest alliances, the biggest players, with the most castles (we can never get as many castles because of the rules), the most troops (we can never get those amounts because we never can get that many castles) are out to destroy one of the most active alliances in this game. Without them this game is over. if another alliances wants to start a war, the top alliance will stop it. They only want to make their own rules. Like tournaments or decide who get's to start a war.You should know that what you are doing is not in the best interest of this game. What will this game be withoutJendrzejGroup Les Templiers, Polka Husaria , Hot Heads,CKD . Also Wolfpack is active for years. You will lose them as well because they are no farmers. Hell, you will lose active players from every alliances. Is this what you want? another 100+ players that will stop this game. and not average players but players that are known for the great battles, great victories and active players. Not only on a daily basis online, but also active on the forum and trying to improve the game.
Also a lot of money less for the developers. So less money to improve the game.
players like Hochstedter are personally responsible for the downfall off this game.
If you are not happy with what is happening, you will intervene with massive amounts of troops.
saying that talking did not work. No! you gave up and are not open for discussions that don't go in your direction.As the biggest players and alliances, you have a responsibility. With power comes great responsibility. There are many ways to get to a sollution, but this is just showing force and disrupt the game in a very bad way.
Think what you are doing! it's not too late to back down and stop this nonsense and get back to the talking table.
You are scared that players are leaving the game, but now you are responsible for this!
Oh it's bad for the game when members from JendrzejGroup are under attack, becoase it's possible that they will leave the game? most players from BR are playing the game since 2009 like me. but destroying us, so plaayers from BR wil leave is not a problem?
-
ofcourse planning is a part of the war, but planning attacks with 5 big members of your Aliance against one of ouhers, that's not fair.And I've not seen those castles yet, but it's not up to you to tell us how to build our castles
-
Ofcourse I also understand Juflo, It's hard to be under attack by more big players/Alliances.
I've been in that same situation -
most of our members had attacks from more than 5 of your bigger members at the same time. Do you call that a real fight? ceap on dreaming.
-
I don't understand why everyone's complayning, You decided to attack us "BR" with 3 ore more Aliances. before you started the war against BR you knew we had a pact with NATO and LGH, So you took a risk for a big war. I was under attack by 4 bigger players from Les Templiers, And I didn't complayn. But I had to capitulate, Because I had no chance at all. So Stop complayning
