hi

sorry i forget

id : 723

universe : retro

les joueurs ne s'ennuient pas ... seulement il y a un gâchis à la fois parce qu'il n'y a plus d'action .. atteindre un certain niveau de point

et quand tu perds ta flotte quand tu es dans le top 10 .. tu n'as plus de ressources pour monter .. alors

cela décourage beaucoup de monde et c'est pourquoi nous perdons beaucoup de gros joueurs

xsuno a raison dans son raisonnement

hello G.O.

we can't send astero santa fight

and we no longer have the listing of the planets on the right with the color codes

AFO

hello

Is there a problem ..??

let me explain
I act as if I send 10 PH from 8/84/1 to 8/84 / 2
the distance is right 358
but on space it puts me
distance .... time .... SPEED .... consumption ... capacity
10 . 358 .00:11:34 ..24000 . 5000 . 112

by clicking on the coo of the plapla and that I put 10 PH I have that
distance .... time ... SPEED .... consumption ... capacity
10 . 358 . 00:10:52 . 27200 . 5000 . 112

while it should be the 2 nd walkthrough which should work so the third 4 fleeter does not work on space

the speed is not adapted to the level of the third parties that we take

please see if it's just a bug or just a clerical error

cordialy

message send to both of you

Hello gentlemen GOs and S.GOs,

I would have liked to have clarified on the C.G.U
Have the RULES of the C.G.U. .. ???
Are you still impartial as in the old days of FR1 ?????
I would like an answer on this question !!
Because it seems to me that certain events are a little neglected !!!
Thank you for your reply

..with ctrl + MAJ + J

(index):7272 crbug/1173575, non-JS module files deprecated.
(anonymous) @ (index):7272

and these are the 2 things that we have when we refresh the spaceinvasion page

This page is not working

Cannot process this request through w1-spaceinvasion.bitmeup.com at this time.

HTTP ERROR 500

. and .
An error occurred.
Sorry, the page you are looking for is currently unavailable.
Please try again later.

If you are the system administrator of this resource then you should check the error log for details.

Faithfully yours, nginx.

each of us has the right to take vacations I think and when we are on vacation
we don't want to think about the game but rather clear our heads to get off on the right foot
but I do not see why to have a double sentence
already in VM the third party 4 jumps ... oki
but when we reconnect we should be able to recover it after 48 h - 72 h and not 1 month
it is just on this point that I said that it is not logical to have a double sentence

lose the 4th point of specialization during a vacation mode I understand it
it is the time of "recovery" which is too long is which penalizes everyone I find
48 - 72 hours to wait, I don't mind
but 1 month I find it too long

that's just what I'm trying to convey

so I want to understand your point of view of the game but understand that if a player takes the 0/4/0 option in specialization it is to have the 4 galaxy scanners
so whether we go on vacation or not .. I do not see why we are going to "punish the player" "for a loss of his 4th radar
and therefore not be able to recover it until 30 days after being out of its vacation mode
it's a double penalty

would there be a G O who could answer us ... ???

thank you

good evening gentlemen the G O
I come to see you because I think there are inconsistencies in the game

I take an example (mine)

you go into vacation mode for X or Y reasons over 10 - 15 - 20 or 30 days because you want to get space during your vacation ................. ..... NORMAL
you are in 0/4/0 so in the logic of your game you have
Tier 4
3 extra raid colony
30% reduced fuel costs
+4 levels engines research
+2 Recycler-engines research
+ 30% Fleet-Speed on inactive Players
+2 additional attacks on each Spacia planet (bash protection)
70% resource theft
an additional active galaxy scanner

ok so 4 radar
now I understand that if you put yourself in vaca mode, you lose your 4th RADAR but you keep the other 3
you leave your VM and you no longer have any RADAR ... ???

normal ... ???
I do not think so

now this is how i see it and i think you can make ALL players like this

On the other hand when the players reconnect 10 - 20 or 57 days later (for example) he "recovers" "his 3 starting radars ...... normal
he lost 1 radar so he must re-activate the 4th and it takes 24 hours for it to be active
but and I said well but to be OBLIGED to wait 1 MONTH to re-activate the 4th this is not normal
complete the tutorial
be out of vacation mode for 30 days
(aaaa-yy-xx 19:54:10)

now i think you can change that

thank you
and this will ensure that the stiffnesses will not be constrained or restrained with respect to others

AFO

UNI : retro

nick : Airforceone1

I D : 723

sir joker good evening
I do not see why close this 2nd post because you have not answered my questions

dschibailt met my expectations on the 1st post so I made a 2nd post to explain my 1st post
I'm just asking for an answer but I see that you are refusing the discussion
would i throw a paving stone in the pond and does that make too many waves ???? for you to answer .. ??

i dont think i'm asking for the moon just you take a look at what i said

AFO

for XSUNO
yes i've been playing space for a long time
"" "" but the way i remember it that it didn't go too well. "" "" it will be necessary to explain this sentence to me because for my part I never gave my account nor my fleet
and I do not hide under an assumed name to come to the forum I have my name and it has always been the same since I played it
Joined: 2008-04-10 18:05:57 it will be 11 years and I have no intention of giving it away ... and certainly not this way in case I quit

dschibailt good evening
I am coming to post here because I think (and I HOPE) that you want to be IMPARTIAL with your playing rules
And I see you are
I am quoting a SPACE rule "" "§4 Account donation:
The acquisition or donation of an account must be made by a request to a GO through the button "game operator". It is forbidden to connect to the account received without first obtaining the agreement of a GO.
An account can only change owners once a month at most.
Donations of accounts are currently prohibited for security reasons.>>>
I repeated myself but I wanna be logical
So in the logic if I follow your reasoning correctly, # account donations are not authorized
NORMAL everyone will say
Now the players have ambitions and I can understand that the game is made so that everyone breaks everyone, is to become the best is the GOAL of the game .. but it is never said or I would have missed an episode GIVE your fleet and resources when you stop the game

THANK YOU for your answer in the previous post:
Yeas - your specific question is a farewell battle, which is forbidden. All resources are booked back by the Gameoperator stuff. If we have proofs that the "winning" (still playing) player is involved into that, we may bring other punishments up to him / her.

So when a player wants to stop the game he has 3 solutions:
1 °) he stops going on his account so after 7 days he will fall yellow and for 90 days he will stay YELLOW before disappearing which leaves the other space players time to ruin him some resources on each planet …………… .LOGICAL and this is 80% of cases
2 °) he stops the game and colonizes a virgin planet, then deletes his account so there will only be research and no more fleet and no more buildings or resources ……… what seems the most LOGICAL to me is 19% cases
You are going to tell me 80 + 19 = only 99% and what is the 1%? well it's the 3 °) below
3 °) it gathers all its fleet and resources on 1 and 1 single planet, once that is done it blows up all the planets so it only has ONE planet and ONE PLANET left with MILLIONS of RESOURCES and MILLIONS of SHIPS ... he talks to a person and tells him i'm going on a 16 day retreat flight and my fleet will come back at such time. such and such a day ...

The person is going to do a flywheel and waits for the D-day but in the meantime this person climbs his flywheel and makes steep steps to the right and to the left .. just to cover the tracks for the GOs ……… .. good idea… LOL a little 'humor doesn't hurt… and the day before the arrival of the' yellow 'fleet, he gathers his fleet and transfers it to his' volante 'and the next day at the appointed time he sends a probe' history of…. And he sends his attack fleet and his recyclers but before all that….

Cast Iron Metal Kryptonite Spice Energy
3,713,376 --1,504,527 - 8,337,071 --- 871,966,635 - 72,985
Light cargo 7 Transmitter 16336 Light fighter 614 Combat fighter 4 Phoenix 20589
Colonizer 1046 Probe 15259 Recycler 62092 Battlecruiser 213503 Stealth Bomber 98
Destroyer 84
This is what was left after his many passages
Cast Iron Metal Kryptonite Spice Energy
37,107 - 14,458 - 59,974 - 5,512,943 - 72,985
He asks his colleagues who are in his coalition to come ‘block the closest planets so that no one can bother him and that he is the only one who can recycle this players

SO if I conclude with my theories the one who does the 3 °) is a cheat and therefore he is liable to an account ban at worst or at least a withdrawal of the resources that he has recovered and recycling too + a resource fine or this point is no longer in the regulations .. ??
Now I made a ticket with the GOs explaining to them roughly what I have just explained here in detail I think that 80% of the players would agree to a sanction of this player in question (who if reads that will be recognized) and if there is no sanction at this level I am not thinking of the incompetence of the GOs but of a laxity knowing that he is a 'big player' and that it would be a mess to give a sanction to someone in the top 50… I said and I would stay in my position there is no right pass on any game whatsoever …… ..

And that this person does not tell me the opposite I saw it on the radar !!!!

THEREFORE GENTLEMEN the G; O; do you want us to step back in the game and go back to the days of FR1 or do you want to move on and go forward ??? and therefore do you find this normal ..?
Tell me no and I will answer you: so why do not you sanction the players in question?
Because I risk being punished because of my freedom and my outspokenness and he will be “untouchable” .. ???
You can always hold yourself to account and express yourself freely (at least I think so) and there is freedom of expression or you would be in a dictatorship
I'm not here to say that what you should or shouldn't do I'm not giving an order I'm just saying that whoever did this was not punished and me yes so for me it's an injustice

AFO

thank you for your response miha but I would like to have a favorable response also from dischbalt or nodelay or both

hello bip bip

I'm not targeting anyone at the moment
I just wanted a confirmation of a special point of the games and to show that I did not say nonsense afterwards
and therefore you are the 1 st player who confirms my statements but what I want to know is if the 2 CGU are identical in their purposes .. !!

Hello dischbalt and nodelay

I am writing to both of you because I only trust your impartiality in the game and that you will respond quickly
I would like you to answer me a question on a point of the SPACE rules and the bitmeup general conditions
I took a look at the space and bitmeup CGU
There are RULES and CGU that we all have to validate and accept to be able to play in space, we agree !!! it is true
So no one is supposed to ignore the laws whether in real life or in any game (therefore the CGU)
So could you explain these two paragraphs to me?

Bitmeup CGU (in German):
1.2 Vertragsgegenstand, Nutzung und Änderung der Spiele und Services
1.2.7 Das Verbot von Pushing gilt ebenso für Accounts verschiedener Nutzer. Ein Account darf nicht dazu genutzt werden, einem Account eines anderen Nutzers etwa durch Übertragung von Gegenständen oder Spielwährung oder durch absichtliches Verlieren eines Kampfes unredlich Vorteile zu verschaffen (sog. „Boosting“).
Space CGU in English):
§ 6 Push
It is forbidden to push (send raw materials without recovering something). Sending resources is only allowed for players who do not have more than 75% of the sending player's points and if the receiving player is not in the top 100 of the total ranking.
The provision of rubble and the destruction / loss of ships / defense units on purpose is also considered a push.
In the event of an illegal thrust producing an asteroid, the astro will be reduced to 0 fields.
Pushing can result in the loss of all affected accounts.
If I understood correctly I cannot give my fleet and my resources to a player otherwise the player in question will be banned Even if I have stopped the game ... ??

I just want an answer from you to know if I am right or if I am wrong and that I did not understand the meaning
Can you explain it to me thank you

PS: give your opinion gentlemen players who are co on the fofo after I would tell you prk I ask that and the rest will happen after the response of G O

AFO

oki thanks

i 'll try later

regard
AFO