"..IT was YOU who started posting again.." - Liar vic_the_slick, YOU started this thread and the thread in the old forum.

Fleet rank:
4. IU
....
6. SCAR

So sad to poor vic_the_slick.

TwoPair, IU IS HIGHER IN FLEET ranks bks is doing better in fleet !

1. Baez left SI as a member of IU and with his fleet yellow - a failure for SCAR
2. I am not familiar with ""provocative actions against SCAR"", probably 1-2 IU players were just playing the game. But now I really provoke the war-loving scarlings where I see them, and whenever they provoke me - a total failure for SCAR, just ask vic_the_slick and -Ethannor-, who came close to me with their war

3. And another objective was there in your war declaration - to support your friends -NoF- in THEIR war vs IU.
-NoF- disbanded during the war - again a total failure for SCAR

SCAR totally failed in all declared war objectives and is losing the war, being unable to stop IU and doing twice worse in fleet !!

At any time you could have ended the war, but you began to count destroyed points, lauding with them, thinking wrong they could mean something in this war. That is why the language of the war was stated in such a way, one side (IU) could claim victory when the opponents' objectives failed. Sorry for your frustration

If SCAR sincerely believes that their war is not for destroyed points, why DO you count at all? Why do YOU post your tiny hits and count useless points? You actually contradict yourself.

The result after all :
FLEET POINTS growth since the begin of the war:
( 1 fleet point = 2000 damage )

IU: + 90.301.220
SCAR: +46.628.905

Again, TwoPair, you have TOTALLY missed the point about your war: the war in SI is not how many points you have destroyed, it is how you are doing in fleet. That is why alliance fleet ranks are posted, not destroying ranks.
Your war can not be won by posting battles and counting points - you do not have an agreement with IU to compete for destroyed points - bks the war like yours in SI is nothing else than just a competition for something, which should be a matter of agreement between the two opponent sides.
You clearly posted the mistake of SCAR - it is not wise to think that the war is only a matter of destroying. Everyone who acts like that will be a loser - it is not a surprise for me that SCAR and its players are low in ranks.

The result after all :
FLEET POINTS growth since the begin of the war:
( 1 fleet point = 2000 damage )

IU: + 90.131.213
SCAR: +46.502.042

nice hit, roza

The following fleets fought against each other on 2017-10-01:

Attacker sitizen

Phoenix - 900.000
Recycler - 1

Defender roza250

Interval cannon - 97
Laser cannon battery - 1000
Solar cannon - 647
Small shield dome - 1
Large shield dome - 1
Transmitter - 344
Solar cells - 722
Battleship - 6666

ROUND - 2 -

Attacker sitizen
Phoenix - 900.000

Defender roza250

DESTROYED

The attacker won the battle!
He won 411 pieces of pig iron, 261 pieces of metal, 340 kryptonite crystals, 55 units of spice

The attacker lost a total of 17.000 units.
The defender lost a total of 458.788.400 units.

There are now 100.354.600 metal and 75.158.760 kryptonite at these space coordinates
The chance of an asteroid forming is 20%

I got the rubble.

TwoPair:
So what ? Some are losing, other are gaining, in result IU is growing (DOing) better than SCAR in fleet:

The result after all :
FLEET POINTS growth since the begin of the war:
( 1 fleet point = 2000 damage )

IU: + 89.704.188
SCAR: +47.213.533

The result after all :
FLEET POINTS growth since the begin of the war:
( 1 fleet point = 2000 damage )

IU: + 89.676.068
SCAR: +46.760.571

The result after all :
FLEET POINTS growth since the begin of the war:
( 1 fleet point = 2000 damage )

IU: + 89.560.966
SCAR: +46.556.617

The result after all :
FLEET POINTS growth since the begin of the war:
( 1 fleet point = 2000 damage )

IU: + 89.428.642
SCAR: +46.244.580

The result after all :
FLEET POINTS growth since the begin of the war:
( 1 fleet point = 2000 damage )

IU: + 89.397.162
SCAR: +46.191.149

The result after all :
FLEET POINTS growth since the begin of the war:
( 1 fleet point = 2000 damage )

IU: + 88.841.807
SCAR: +44.233.385

The result after all :
FLEET POINTS growth since the begin of the war:
( 1 fleet point = 2000 damage )

IU: + 88.354.401
SCAR: +44.613.928

Look again which raids they have posted - they are showing some kind of irony.
But I agree with you - no need to be posted.

The alliance efficiency during war is not destroying only, it is destroying + building. The better alliance has the better result. And I post it just bks they post their ""warpoints"", as an answer of their infant behavior.
From the IU SI page:
""IU does not count warpoints - this mean it can not win or lose a war by warpoints.""

The result after all :
FLEET POINTS growth since the begin of the war:
( 1 fleet point = 2000 damage )

IU: + 87.902.704
SCAR: +44.210.128

The result after all :
FLEET POINTS growth since the begin of the war:
( 1 fleet point = 2000 damage )

IU: + 87.273.602
SCAR: +43.555.767

Remove them and pay the owners the cost of all removed buildings on them.

The result after all :
FLEET POINTS growth since the begin of the war:
( 1 fleet point = 2000 damage )

IU: + 86.428.635
SCAR: +43.252.088

The result after all :
FLEET POINTS growth since the begin of the war:
( 1 fleet point = 2000 damage )

IU: + 85.253.942
SCAR: +42.851.021