that is correct
- 1Page 1 of 2
- 2
-
-
No. You are being deliberately dense. Playing on Saebor's pain for your own fun. You just like to argue, you don't care that he lost his fleet. You just want to stir.
It is not suspicious. You are just a noob. I'm done here.
Well you know it is suspicious hence why you admitted that you previously told the GOs how you did it. If it wasnt suspicious you wouldnt have told the GOs....
-
But even before you suggested this, he already stated that he had told an admin... so of course we presume that you have an alternative point that you want us to read between the lines so to speak.
Not once have I said that you said that....
But I am saying it is something that nobody is going to explain to you...
No, it isn't. Please go back and read the thread again.
Yes, the GOs have said they will.
At last we agree. It is pretty simple. All is clear. Move on...
But it is suspicious. Hence why you admitted that you already explained it to a GO
-
Saeborwolff, I have played with you in previous uni's, and I know you can play as well as most of the players here, but intercepting EFs is something I was doing back in EN uni 2, so I know it is not difficult. It requires time to set up with gathering info and observation of the player's habits, and sometimes a little bit of luck helps, but it really is not something that is difficult. I won't share yet some of the easy strategies you can use to stop from catching your ef. But, it is for this reason that I think the EF assistant needs to be adjusted. It makes you vulnerable now. You cannot as easily hide your ef times now. But it is still possible to protect your efs.
Chris Dior, I very seldom see you post constructive posts on the boards. A lack of knowledge is not a great foundation for a loud voice. I have been reported to GOs for intercepting an EF back in 2010 under bigpoint times. It took one message for me to explain to the GO how I did it, then there was no problem. And I did NOT explain to my victim. Having someone cry to GOs when your skill is superior is actually very satisfying. So the more you cry here, the less you will make a difference except to become a target. I am completely confident that there a LOT of players that will be happy to mess with you to demonstrate how to catch an EF.
Not once have I said explain it to your victim. It is clearly a suspicious play and a GO should look into it. Pretty simple.
-
I have been reported for something like this many times befor and jsut for your information I have already talked to a GO and explained how I calulated everything but jut because I have to explain it to a GO doesnt mean I have to tell everyone in Forum.
Not once have I said tell the forum. I have been very clear saying you need to tell an Admin
-
in my account he wouldnt find anything cause i am not the one who attacked
and the Gos know how to intercepts ef theire is no need to proof every single attack and spy each time a player get killed his ef.
Whoever attacked needs their account looking into. Only a guilty person would try to talk to admins out of looking into the account...
-
In fact Sonu dont need to explain anything here for someone. I offered to explain it to the end of the universe thats much more than a gamer needs to do. So I would advise to be patient with comments like "suspicious" or "its easy to say ....".
I personally can tell you if theire is enought time or enought informations you can intercept everyones ef, just a matter oft time and data
You dont need to explain anything. The admin need to look into your account and his to determine how you would know when his EF would return.
-
It looks suspicious to me. Very easy to say that you just calculated it. Well how? If the player EF everyday at a different time then how would you work it out?
If I was admin I would be looking to see if the player attacking player spied everyday.
I would be looking to see if the defending player EF everyday at the same time and to the same place and if his fleet arrived back everyday at the same time or at different times.
I am not sure how you can intercept an EF if the players fleet arrived back at different times etc.
-
so does this uni just give you Urplasma?
-
Hi,
What is the biggest turtle you have seen in SI history?
-
I have a lot of days left on my merchant. Will it be transferred over to my main account when the Universe is stopped?
-
Hi again,
For me now its the 2x i see many reds and then you come with this event at the end of the week wenn the most have half or full cargo
Can you higher up the stock of Santa to 2500 at least^^
Man man man^^
I think they increased the red because it is xmas now
-
The base value of any tech ist already 100% so the diffrence between weapon19 and weapon20 is 300%/290% = 3,4% more value in one of the 3 tech categories. There is not doing to be large noticeable changes with improving techs at this point unless you have like 10kk Phoenix or more.
Ok, the tech level 20 might not make a difference now but if my fleet was xxx points bigger than the techs would make a difference? is that what youre saying?
-
you can look at it 2 ways.
weapon20 with your fleet vs weapon19 and your fleet + ships you can build with the cost of weapon20.
and then both options vs lets say half your fleet like an enamy could have that you would attack.
compare the options and what ever has you losing the least amount of units is better.
It is confusing. If i insert 50,000 ships then i deal extra damage. If i remove those extra 50,000 ships and up the research to lvl 20 then for defence and shield it makes no difference having the research or not, not a tiny bit of difference.
-
you could just test that in the fight simulator...
I am not sure how accurate it is. It shows the extra fleet as better as it causes more damage. When I put in the research the weapons tech does improve the damage but the defence and shield research do nothing.
-
Should I spend resources on research or instead build more ships? I am debating researching level 20 weapons technology but with those resources I could build a lot of ships. Is it better to have the ships or the research?
-
I would like this too.
-
When I go on SI master and do various battles, I find that the only research that makes any difference to the battle is weapons technology. The other two only make a very minor difference, and considering the cost and time to research them, is it better to just invest in more ships?
-
That makes sense, cheers
-
Hi all,
The miner specialisation reduces defence costs eg level 3 is a 15% discount. However, even though the discount is applied and they are cheaper, the points it gives you is not discounted. An interval cannon when you have level 3 miner spec should be 13 points rather than the base 15 because it is cheaper to purchase. It states on the defence profile it is 13 points yet it still gives full points of 15.
Surely the points should not be the full points because you are spending less resources so it should be less points.