This is just my opinion!
I understand if someone disagrees with me!
I read a lot of good ideas!
I don’t think the good ide to pushing down the top players.
These players made the balance!
To limit the number of castles, a good idea is 130 castles.because we just spend 25-50 euros maximum per month. (beautiful)
If someone players have 300-400 castles im sure 150 euros or maybe more. i dont know,but maybe not fair!!
if I remember well before merge all of the worlds (2013) 16,500 players played, in very many alliances,and there were no restrictions.
(I played the German last stand alliance.)
Restrictions have brought about a decline in players.
(Some restrictions were very good!)
But too many restraints came at the same time!!
The medium alliances who fought against each other began to disappear or merge,and I see the problem in that!
I wouldn’t think the biggest players are the ones who are dangerous.
Why would the player with the bigest military power have an interest in destroying anyone? I would think that he is working to prevent anyone from being destroyed. NO! (I don't understand why you guys want to pushing down him?)
Limiting the number of alliances, supporting small and medium-sized players (military production in Baldur castles)
Let's be honest. Everyone knows everyone. How can you change anything?
(Can we merge together and we attack the Space Invasion?) hehe
