I appreciate you taking the time to check the matter out... Yes last year I messaged GO's about someone's fleet being restored and had some choice words for the action of his fleet being restored.
    Yes I thought maybe it was picking up misspellings or incorrect punctuation in the message.
    Do you want me to private message you my GO ticket message or post here?

    again...Thanks

    Hey I don't know what you tested in my account. . but this is either communication problem I was speaking of OR the button is faulty or I am lol.


    This was the message I was trying to send to GO on friday, sat etc. The content of message it seems is not as important to anyone but I am curious as to why GO button is not working when you say from testing my account it is working. . but its not. ?(

    So that is another problem, The reason I am posting in here is because when I do the message to GO and send it just says

    "spaceinvasion.bitmeup.com says"

    "an error occurred during the process! "

    and - just saying -

    its right now not disabled.

    I think we are having communication/translation problems on my end or yours. My site refresh is disactivated. its always disactivated. I never enable it while ships are being built or ever for that matter. I don't think I have ever ever turned it on.

    To now accuse other players of illegal activities is for me a sign of a bad loser.

    Congratulations to Mihawk and Pornstar

    I think maybe you mis read my question. . Is asking for clarification on a attack a accusation of cheating??? You get your feathers fluffed pretty easy then.

    As I stated in my previous post, " I'm not gonna take anything away from PornoStar or MiHawkk if in fact this is a legal maneuver to do for a couple second delay in response then good job."


    I also think maybe you don't understand what I'm saying, I would have been in my fleet command screen at 10 seconds if not for a spy probe being sent simultaneously as my fleet is coming back, that is what cause delay. anyways you seem to be aggressive in your response because asking a question to you is being a bad loser.

    Have a good day.

    Ok so this answers my question, IT IS LEGAL TO DO. Thanks. I disagree because it did cause interference with my system but that's fine better for clarification now so when Eidanehii uses it on someone as I'm sure he will use any legal exploitations. Then no one will be getting there fleet back then..............again.

    when i understand that correctly you miss the fact that you can disable page refreshs

    My page refresh was disabled. If that is what you meant. It was not a lack of page refresh. If you click on the "fleet commands" button it should after your fleet comes back bring you to fleet command screen where you can load up fleet to escape flight, my clicking on the fleet command button just acted as a refresh or the spy probe acted as that when I clicked on the "fleet command" button. . If it had worked properly or if the spy probe had not been sent I would have landed on the fleet command screen and had my fleet sitting there or if I had clicked on it too early it still would have brought me to fleet command screen while just not showing my fleet landed cause I clicked it too early.

    My page refresh is never on.


    So this is a legal move to do then? to launch a spy probe say the second before or the second someone's fleet comes back at them to cause a possible delay? If it is legal how many people can do this move?

    say could more than 1 person do this? or can only the person who is doing the attack do it?


    just for future use.

    Yes just a single, launched within the second of my fleet landing back, I know its not the spam attack of X number of probes landing at the same time on target planet that fleet is returning to. . But the singular launch of 1 spy probe right as or just the second after my fleet landed back. If its is in fact legal than it is but it did cause in effect in my opinion the same thing as a spam attack ( A delay in screen refresh ). When I watched my fleet come back, I clicked on fleet command, I was expecting to see my fleet command screen instead I seen a refresh of my screen with it going back to the main screen with 1 extra red line (the spy probe) launched.

    Any maybe this is legal to do but here is what my issue is, it did cause a delay or not reactive response to my click of "fleet command" button same as spy probes landing and this gave him the extra couple seconds.


    I'm not gonna take anything away from PornoStar or MiHawkk if in fact this is a legal maneuver to do for a couple second delay in response then good job.
    But I did think according to the rules on spam attack that the main reason for it being illegal is the delay or inability for fleet command button to work for a period of time, in this case the delay of a couple seconds was all that was needed.



    Code
    Ja, nur eine einzige, die innerhalb der Sekunde nach der Landung meiner Flotte gestartet wurde, ich weiß, dass es nicht der Spam-Angriff von X Sonden ist, die gleichzeitig auf dem Zielplaneten landen, zu dem die Flotte zurückkehrt. . Aber der einzigartige Start von 1 Spionagesonde direkt oder gleich in der Sekunde, nachdem meine Flotte zurückgelandet ist. Wenn es tatsächlich legal ist, dann hat es meiner Meinung nach dasselbe bewirkt wie ein Spam-Angriff ( Eine Verzögerung bei der Bildschirmaktualisierung ). Als ich sah, wie meine Flotte zurückkam, klickte ich auf Flottenbefehl, ich hatte erwartet, meinen Flottenbefehlsbildschirm zu sehen, stattdessen sah ich eine Aktualisierung meines Bildschirms mit einer Rückkehr zum Hauptbildschirm mit einer zusätzlichen roten Linie (der Spionagesonde), die gestartet wurde .
    
    Vielleicht ist dies legal, aber hier ist mein Problem: Es hat zu einer Verzögerung oder nicht reaktiven Reaktion auf meinen Klick auf die Schaltfläche „Flottenbefehl“ geführt, genau wie bei der Landung von Spionagesonden, und dies gab ihm die zusätzlichen paar Sekunden.
    
    
    Ich werde PornoStar oder MiHawkk nichts wegnehmen, wenn dies tatsächlich ein legales Manöver ist, um ein paar Sekunden Verzögerung bei der Antwort zu haben, dann gute Arbeit.
    Aber ich dachte gemäß den Regeln für Spam-Angriffe, dass der Hauptgrund dafür, dass es illegal ist, die Verzögerung oder Unfähigkeit ist, dass die Flotten-Befehlstaste für einen bestimmten Zeitraum funktioniert, in diesem Fall war es nur eine Verzögerung von ein paar Sekunden erforderlich.

    Friday I sent attack at Mi Hawk, About 10-12 seconds from my attack landing at Mi Hawk ,Porno Star attacked my return flight. I seen this and fast as I could clicked return flight to bring back my fleets.


    This left about 10 seconds to escape flight my fleet after it returned with Porno Star fleet incoming for attack.


    This is enough time for me to escape flight and I even simulated it before the event to be really good. I was timing that it would take me about 7-8 seconds. . It would be close but I should have been able to save it.


    So I'm watching the timer clock down. 5,4,3,2,1, and I click :fleet commands" and my screen, it refreshes and what pops up is the not fleet commands but the main view and I can see a spy probe that was launched about the same exact time or within a second of my fleet coming back, this caused the delay of about 2-maybe 3 seconds and that was all he needed to not allow me to escape flight in time to save. I have talked to some people in BBB and they do not think this was legal and should write you guys about it.


    I can't say for sure it was Porno Star who launched spy probe, but I can say with 100% certainty that a spy probe was launched the second of or right after my fleet landed. I know I seen a extra red line besides his attack coming in and it was a spy probe, But I did not look to see who it was, I know it did not land cause it was recalled in about 3-4 seconds after my fleet was crashed. I just did not take the time to look with the need to hurry up as fast as possible to try and save fleet.


    This is what happened, and I'm wondering if this was a legal move to do?


    Thank you for your time on this matter.


    This took place in Sirius Uni

    Just wanted to wish one of the best players to ever play the game a farewell. He truly made the game a better game.

    A true hunter of fleets. If he wanted your fleet chances are . . . he got it.

    best wishes.


    Sun662

    I agree that advertising would help, the problem is more player retention I believe. People build up that fleet for a couple months and :cursing: POP :cursing: along comes someone and fleet is gone. ?( They walk away, I think some people play for a couple months and still don't get the concept of Escape Flight. Maybe a pay option for noob players to recoup some of their fleet the first time they get a fleet over 100k under 500k in fleet back?