Looking at people who have opted for the different options, I get the impression that extending the attack protection and a possible relaxation of the capitulation system is motivated less by the problems in real life and more by problems in the game.
I am in favor of players, who can give even a small amount of support to this terrible real life situation, should be able to do so without this affecting their game.
But seizing the events in real life to gain advantage or avoid disadvantage in the game....
I already reported it in another topic, this is a game. We are sporting opponents, not enemies. If a player is confronted with special challenges in real life, they can always make it known. I don't think a player whose alliance profile states that he is busy with refugee work will be attacked.
As the past of Damoria has shown, special features will be abused by taking advantage in an improper way.
And that is why I choose not to vote for special provisions in this game and I hope that whoever is going to vote/voted ,at least make/made an effort not to include their own situation in the game when making their mind up.