The hall of fame is a way to see incredible battles and to encourage the spirit of the players, seeing reports of battles between attacker and defender, and I do not think it is a bad idea, even including me in the game comes up with a way to exchange reports or espionages between players within the same alliance, this is widely used in other games, but I consider that the current use is to publish reports at your own discretion for free in view of everyone, that is what is not fair, and even a way to give information unfairly.
Since the fair thing is that the opponents, attacker or defender (not of supports that can be allies or not), if they want they can publish these reports but that they are not the supports of such a battle, since troops that could justly be published take out with battles won with espionages.
Personally I consider that the use of props to get reports is an unfair but not penalized form of the game, questionable for many but there is no going to enter into discussion, but there are to be able to publish these reports in the hall of fame, where it should be the decision of the attacker involved (if he can just spy) or defender if he does not mind publishing it.

This topic was indeed discussed extensively previously and I was one of those who raised this issue that now returns to the forum, it is your time or I was not understood or did not explain myself well.

I understand that what is stated here is clear, and it is that it is not right for a third player to publish a report in the hall of fame, this as I said previously could only be done by the attacker and the defender. and explained to me.

I mean

Dschibait suppose that I am in conflict with you and I am attacking your castles, and I have an interest in conquering them, logically I want to know what troops you have in your castle to plan my attack on that castle. (you ask your companions for help and they help you), I sent a spy attack to find out what troops you have in your castle and I lose the battle, so I cannot find out what troops you have and you will be happy because you have defeated me in the battle and I have not achieved my objective, but one of his companions who has helped him with his troops hangs the report of the battle in the hall of fame and I, despite not winning the battle, still know what troops you have it is his castle.

I plan my attack with the adequate troops and in sufficient numbers to win and conquer his castle because someone has published the report and thus I am with advantage obtaining information that you avoided with your fight so that I did not get it.

This is what I think is being considered here, in my modest opinion this is not logical, the only ones who could post the reports of attacks in the hall of fame would be the attacker and the owner of the castle and no one else, as I said. long time.

Hay muchas diferencias para mi. Pero si esto es lo que piensas, hago la misma pregunta que el título de este hilo, ¿para qué son los espías?

Creo que el creador del hilo no está hablando de que un tercero envíe el informe al atacante de forma privada, es una vieja táctica de juego que usan todos los jugadores y tiene o tuvo sus riesgos y no todos los usaron, pero ahora es más fácil de hacer sin repercusiones (pero este es otro tema), pero ese informe permanece en la esfera privada, el atacante ha obtenido el informe que le interesó, pero no todos los jugadores en el juego y esta es una de las diferencias por las que me preguntas

Todavía creo que para publicar informes en el salón de la fama, solo los afectados, el atacante y el defensor y nadie más deberían poder hacerlo. y no estoy cuestionando el hilo del salón de la fama, por el contrario, me gusta mucho porque podemos ver grandes batallas de los atacantes y los defensores.

He tratado de explicar lo que entiendo que el creador del hilo quiere plantear y expresar mi opinión al respecto y si se tiene en cuenta, entonces, genial, y si no, creo que lo que presento no podría ser valorado, yo Nunca he querido o no entraré en una discusión al respecto que no conducirá a nada. Saludos cordiales y gracias por su atención.

My apologies, my answer supposedly should have been published in English, I have the google translator activated for the page, but when updating it to publish some error of mine occurred and it was published in Spanish text.

As for the dischabit question, I think I answered it, but if this is not the case or if I do not understand it that way, I also apologize, we discussed this on a previous occasion and it will not lead to anything going back to the same thing.

personally it is not the same for me that a third party can post reports in the hall of fame, in my case there are several reports in the hall of fame of attacks carried out by me, one of them is to a disabled person and I did not put that report It has been put by a third player without my permission, understanding that this attack on a disabled person is mine from my personal scope of the game and I think it should be me who could put that report and not another player, if we understand or how I understand that the room of fame is for the players to post reports of their achievements or their defeats, that is to say that this page its intention is that the players who obtain or have great battles for their skill in defense or attack can show their skills and achievements before the rest of the players as an acknowledgment, therefore I still think that it is a decision of the attacker or a default if it is not a disabled defender.

I hope I have answered you and if not, I beg your pardon the language barrier is an insurmountable wall for me even if I use a translator because it gives errors in translation and interpretation.